In the last decades there are
several factors which led to a decrease in gas and oil production in
Chile. Certainly, the depletion of conventional resources in the Estrecho de
Magallanes, which historically has been the place where oil and gas activity
have taken place in the country, initially onshore and subsequently offshore, is one.
The petroleum activity in the southern region dates back to 1945 with the discovery of the first deposit. In 1950, the National Petroleum Company (ENAP) was created with the aim of engaging in exploration and production of oil. In Chile, both the underground gas and petroleum belong to the State, and ENAP has the right to engage in exploration and production activities of both oil and gas.
The peak in oil
production occurred in 1982 with 55,000 barrels per day (b/d) of crude oil,
what drop to 18,000 b/d in 2012. For natural gas, this peak was in 1973 with 22
million cubic meters (considering the reinjection), and fell to 3.75 million
cubic meters per day by 2010.
In the early 1970s, when
onshore production starts to decline, ENAP launch and offshore oil exploration
and production project in the Estrecho de Magallanes. This program helps to
revert the downturn in oil production, and in 1982 the country reached its peak
in oil production. However, since then, ENAP resources to invest in exploration
and production activities were dwindling. It did not invest in new technology
or exploration wells, with 120 wells drilled in 1982, between 2000 and
2005 ENAP drilled only five wells. And thus, domestic oil and natural gas production was mainly
determined by the existent wells rate of decline. At that time, was the
belief that the area of Magallanes is an area already depleted. With this idea ENAP start looking for alternative oil sources to secure the
country´s supply.
ENAP was gradually losing relevance in the domestic oil supply, with declining levels of production, rising domestic demand, and an oversize cost structure not adjusted to the
levels of production. Thus, adding the inefficiencies of a poorly managed
company, it confronted increasing levels of debt and decreasing resources to
invest in exploration and production. The way foresaw to revert the declining
domestic production was to internationalize the company, launching an
investment program in oil exploration and production abroad. This program was leaded by SIPETROL, a new subsidiary of ENAP, as the vehicle to engaged in oil
exploration and production in Argentina, Ecuador and Egypt. Also, gradually the
State of Chile opens the sector to private investment.
The private companies that want to participate in oil and gas exploration and production, are allowed to do it in a
consortium with ENAP, alone or with other companies, where a concession known as
Special Contracts for Exploration and Exploitation of Hydrocarbons (CEOP) was needed from the government. The CEOPs establish a set of conditions for investments
in exploration, production and infrastructure, for operation, in the number of wells
to be drilled and the participation of the private company, the participation of ENAP and the State in
the recovered oil and gas, and a time period to carry the required program.
The first CEOPs were given in 1977, attracting new investment in oil and gas
exploration and production. However, they were not enough to turn around the
downward trend in exploration and production. Next, by the end of the 2000 decade and early 2010 new CEOPs have been granted, and in 2010 the region starts to notice a slight
improvement in the proven oil and gas reserves and production. Nevertheless, well
below the reserves and production of the beginning of the decade. Further, for a long period has existed a plan to open new offshore and onshore areas for CEOPs, with an offshore area that goes from the coast of Valparaiso to Chiloe, more than
1300 miles long if you take a straight line.
To succeed Chile in turning around the decline
in oil and gas production, it must be bolder in improving the business
environment, the contract framework, and in opening new areas for oil and gas
exploration and production to attract more investment and new technologies. The
risks of the oil industry are diverse and extensive. And usually, in the
developing world, more than the geological risk, the greatest risks are over
the ground, on issues related with the regulatory framework, rule of law,
enforcing contracts, proper prices which take into account the costs and risks
of the activity.
Another important aspect, which mainly affects
the incentives to attract private investment to the Magallanes Region, is the
generalized subsidies that exist for natural gas consumption. The natural gas
household prices in the region are US$ 1.3 per million of BTU, plus the value
added from the distribution cost, and this is below the production costs of new
wells.
The region is home to approximately 160,000
people, and most of them live in the regional capital, the city of Punta
Arenas. In 2013 residential natural gas consumption in the region reached 184
million cubic meters. However, the national capital, the city of Santiago, with
a population of 7 million, in 2013 reached residential natural gas consumption
of 248 million cubic meters. Thus, the Magallanes Region, with a population
that is 2.3% of the population of Santiago, has a level of natural gas
consumption equal to 74.2% of what is consumed in the national capital. It can
be claimed that Santiago has a much warmer weather than Punta Arenas. Yes, that
is true! But, what if we compare the per capita level of natural gas
consumption in Magallanes, with that, for example, of Minnesota, USA? No one can
claim that Minneapolis has warmer winters Punta Arenas. In Minnesota the per
capita consumption of natural gas for residential customers is about 666 cubic
meters, while in Magallanes this figure reaches 1150 cubic meters. By both
comparisons, the level of natural consumption in Magallanes is very high!
The heavily subsidized natural gas price, which
makes no difference in the poverty status of the beneficiaries, has encouraged
an increasing use of natural gas, and has led the current administration to ask
the Chilean Congress, in the 2015 Finance Act, to allocate US $ 92.5 million to
subsidize the natural gas price in the region for the year 2015. This
translates into a subsidy of $ 578 per person per year. As reference, in 2012
the Government of Chile spent on grants and bonds to reduce poverty US $ 517
million, of which US $ 156.6 million were used to ensure what has been called
the ethical family income that is aimed at the poorest families. A total of
220,795 families were benefitted by this grant, receiving US $ 709 per
household or US $ 177 per person (assuming a family of four). This huge
distortion encourages consumption but create a negative incentive to attract
new private investments in the sector. Instead of this generalized subsidy, the
authorities should lock for a more focused subsidy that tackles the poor. This
is a highly politicize issue in the region, where exist the belief that this
gas is for their own and domestic consumption.
Given the uncertainties and prospects for oil
and natural gas exploration and production in the region, METHANEX, a methanol
producer and the main natural gas consumer in the region, have confirmed that
it withdraw gas exploration in Magallanes and that it has dismantled two of the
four production trains it has in the region. METHANEX was an important factor
to enable large investment in exploration and production of natural gas for the
region, but given the uncertainties surrounding property rights to dispose
freely of the produced natural gas, at a reasonable price, and because of the
better prospects for this activity in other regions of the world, the role of
METHANEX as an investment enabler has been seriously diminished. Having
adequate prices in the foreseeable future that cover the costs and risks of the
sector is crucial and essential to attract new investments, but this is
something that is not happening in Magallanes.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario